Connect with us


A Lack of Faith: EA Needs its Star Wars Privileges Revoked




EA took another hit last week with the cancelation of its Star Wars Vancouver project and, as a result, so did Disney. EA has long garnered its fair share of criticism, but, when the titan publisher received the rights to publish Star Wars titles, it was handed keys to the universe. Suddenly, a pantheon of developers had the chance to build on something uniquely special.

With endless lore to pull from, material that can be easily translated into video games, and existing IP to build off, EA should have had its next decade of titles in the bag. Sadly, Star Wars has only proven to be a burden for EA, and now is the time for Disney to act on the damage the game publisher has caused.

Perhaps the most controversial of EA’s Star Wars titles is DICE’s Battlefront series. Fans had been frothing at the mouth at the simple idea of a Star Wars: Battlefront reboot for decades, and EA had every intention to deliver. DICE was familiar with massive-scale battles thanks to its time with the Battlefield series and made for the perfect fit.

EASome of the hype turned out to be misguided though, as both of DICE’s Battlefront titles faced varying levels of scrutiny. While the first Battlefront had a backbone comprised of stellar graphics and strong gameplay, the abysmal content offerings did little to justify a USD$60 price tag. The second Battlefront brought with it an entire single-player campaign, but also single-handedly stirred up the loot box controversy the industry is still facing. Either way, looking back on both titles in a positive light can be difficult thanks to the shroud of controversy. Nevertheless, rushed development and strange microtransaction choices are not necessarily the fault of the developer.

Overt and intrusive business choices are all over the Battlefront name and, by extension, Disney’s name too. The heads of the publisher were the ones overseeing everything at DICE and need to be held accountable for two fiascos in a row. A duo of Battlefront controversies is bad enough, but the parade of bad Star Wars decisions does not stop at the shaming of a single project.

eaDICE managed to please its publisher, which is more than the folks who worked at Visceral Games can say. When EA announced its Star Wars deal, Visceral, the developer behind the genre-defining Dead Space series, was among the few revealed to be working on a Star Wars project. Promises of a narrative-driven action game in the Lucasfilm universe had everyone on the edges of their seats. Even famed third-person action game director Amy Hennig signed on to steer the project. However, despite a promising view from the outside, the project may have always been doomed.

Kotaku reported back in 2017 that some employees felt EA had no desire to support single-player games anymore. Potential closure was a heavy burden to bare too, which produced an “unhealthy” working environment. Messy management on EA’s part was all over the development of the unreleased Star Wars project. Furthermore, Visceral had been on death’s door since Dead Space 3 failed to perform. Even so, EA seemed to have thought that shuffling around the studio’s scheduled projects by ham fisting a Star Wars game was the right call. Visceral was closed for good by late 2017 and, with everything considered, the shutdown seems almost inevitable.

eaPassionate people all wanting to put out the best title possible were let go. Regardless of the circumstances, what the public sees after a studio closure is a parent company that failed to care—not only for the business it puts out the world, but for the people who were sacrificed to do so as well.

What was to become of Visceral’s aborted final game? Well, EA decided to move the assets over to EA Vancouver so that the next team up on the chopping block had a chance to deliver on impossible demands. This series of events all led to what transpired behind the scenes last week. EA has proven to be a business bent on failing with the Star Wars brand: so much so that one may struggle to justify the continuation of the Disney deal.

Now that the Vancouver team had to finally scrap this long-running project, rumors have emerged that the same team has begun work on a much smaller Star Wars title. Titanfall developer Respawn Entertainment is also working on its game, Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order. These tedious attempts to regain the trust of consumers is exhausting, so where does the buck stop?

eaNot one of the projects started so far have favored positively among fans. These games are not failures, but companies do not exist to create sub-par experiences that will only garner so-so sales. Star Wars is a name that floats, and EA is shooting holes in its own boat. Disney needs to step in because EA’s third strike is already up. Audiences want to see what Respawn can do with such a fitting IP, but Disney finding new management or talent is a better call than taking the same risks over and over again. Now is the time for EA to stop trying because its opportunity to “do or do not” is long gone.

Continue Reading


The PlayStation 5 Specs Are Beefy, But Not Entirely Necessary



PlayStation 5

Six years have passed since the launch of the PlayStation 4, and, consequently, the launch of the eighth generation of consoles. Throughout this time the industry has seen a shift in how the medium is consumed. Nowadays, gamers are no longer forced to experience titles through conventional controller inputs thanks to the implementation of VR, while visual performance and optimization are at record heights given the current technology available to developers.

For well over a year now, rumors and speculations have sprung up surrounding the next generation of hardware from both Sony and Microsoft, with the latter being more open about its technological aspirations. Despite withholding true hardware specifications, Microsoft does not shy away from igniting conversations around its next systems (yes plural). Sony, on the other hand, has been extremely tight lipped on the topic, only hinting at the PlayStation 5 during a discussion on the success of the PS4.

Until now, consumers were left to speculate on the possibilities of what the PlayStation 5 will contain. To the surprise of many, however, Sony has unexpectedly opened up about the final specifications that will be found within the upcoming hardware. Lead architect on Sony’s next console Mark Cerny detailed how important this generational leap is for the company and what consumers can expect from its beefy machine. While confirming some rumors, and debunking others, Cerny expressed Sony’s desire for the new generation to allow “for fundamental changes in what a game could be.” As a bold statement by Cerny, this ideology will help Sony fall in line with the trajectory that other studios, such as Xbox, have had during the eighth generation of consoles.

For those who are unaware, the PS4 launched in 2013 to wide success, re-establishing Sony’s brand at the forefront of console gaming. Although the console became a household and media juggernaut, many tech-savvy individuals were quick to point out the flaws within its hardware. For example, much of the specifications that the PS4 touted were, in fact, already outdated at release when compared to high-end PC rigs. Despite the obvious limitations of console gaming, the choice of hardware found within the PS4 proved puzzling, as it was being marketed as a giant leap forward for the industry. Sony would later attempt to mitigate the ongoing damage caused by underperforming hardware with the mid-generation iteration of the PS4 Pro, though this attempt only served to extend the console lifecycle by another few years.

From the outset, Sony knew its largest issue was underperforming hardware, and, thanks to the information detailed by Mark Cerny, the community finally has some insight on how that will be addressed. For starters, the CPU found within the PS5’s hardware will use the third generation of AMD’s Ryzen line which is a massive leap over the PS4’s Jaguar chip. Although I am not much for technical jargon within the PC economy, I do understand how much the Jaguar chip held back performance within the eighth generation, and I welcome the Ryzen with open arms. My only hope is that this upgrade will be enough to sustain the PlayStation 5 throughout the years and maintain its presence as a PC competitor.

Additionally, the custom AMD Navi GPU that will be present in the PS5 will support ray-tracing, a feature that only a few games fully utilize on PC, but nonetheless will provide a more realistic experience. Although this specific feature is a welcome addition to the console ecosystem, I honestly never expected it to be a priority. While having real-time accurate reflections within the environment will definitely increase immersion, I would personally desire a more optimized experience that will never falter during play. We will have to wait until more is revealed on the PS5’s ray-tracing technology, but I can only hope that it will not take priority over performance.

Building upon the implementation of ray-tracing with the PS5, Cerny noted that, for him, the audio technology present within the PS4 did not achieve the standards of a generational leap from the PS3. According to Cerny, the PS5 will implement 3D Audio, dramatically changing how gamers perceive sound within a video game. The inclusion of 3D Audio sounds like a well-deserved feature for PlayStation veterans. However, I feel as though this addition will only benefit those who have an entertainment setup that supports it. Unfortunately, individuals who resort to stereo speakers could potentially see no difference in how the audio is delivered from PS5 titles compared to those on PS4.

The interview also provided information surrounding the type of storage available in the PS5. As a much-needed addition, the PlayStation 5 will contain a solid state drive (SSD), which will allow for faster load times and experiences. As many PlayStation users know, the PS4 can provide some appalling load times, leading this issue to be a constant topic of discussion throughout the entire generation. The possibility of a game having long load times was so great that it often made headlines in video game’s media, pleading for action to be taken (Bloodborne anyone?).

Thankfully, information on the PS5’s hard drive capabilities does not require too much speculation, as Cerny provided an example of how fast it will be. According to him, Marvel’s Spider-Man, which has an average of a 15 second load time on a PS4 Pro, will have just 0.8 second load times on a PS5. No indication is yet forthcoming as to how consistent this technological feat will be across different titles, and I urge consumers to temper their expectations on the speed of the PS5 because only time will tell how efficient it can be. Regardless of my concerns surrounding inconsistencies, the PS5 will feature the fastest load times of any console before it, eliminating one of the greatest issues of the PS4’s hardware.

Bloodborne gameplay 1

In addition to the announcement that PlayStation 5 will have an SSD, Cerny confirmed a much-desired feature in backwards compatibility. Although this feature will not reach as far back as the competition, the PS5 will be compatible with PS4 titles, both digital and physical. This was to be expected—seeing as both consoles will run off the same architecture—but the silence from Sony proved worrisome for some fans, myself included. While I am disappointed that PS3 titles will not be compatible with the PS5, I understand that the cell processor of that earlier device would take more effort than it is worth to make games from the platform compatible. Regardless, PlayStation fans can rejoice in this news, as it further validates any investment into the PS4’s ecosystem.

Where I draw most of my criticism from Mark Cerny’s report on the specifications of the PS5 is within the idea that Sony’s next hardware will support 8K resolution. To be clear, I am not stating that such an achievement is impossible; rather I question the necessity of it. Given everything that we know about the PS5, one can assume that the system will cost around USD $500. With 4K televisions slowly becoming a household norm, is it worthwhile for a company to be devoting resources into a feature that will likely not be consumer friendly for years to come? I understand that Sony is at a disadvantage right now with the Xbox One X outputting at native 4K, but seeking to outdo the competition to this extent seems financially unobtainable for most consumers.

My concerns develop from individuals who hear the news of PS5 and 8K resolution and assume it to be the Second Coming. It is unfeasible to have a $500 to $600 console run at a native 8K resolution. Anyone who believes this will happen need look no further than PlayStation’s competition with the Xbox One X. At its launch, Microsoft was selling the Xbox One X at a loss, solely to prevent the console from exceeding the $500 mark and turning away consumers. Microsoft’s current machine is capable of outputting at a native 4K resolution, whereas the PS4 Pro can only achieve the same through upscaled checkerboarding. The PS5 will surely be able to output at a native 4K resolution, but to expect anything more with the current state of consumer technology is wishful thinking. I urge consumers to understand that if the PS5 has an 8K setting, it will likely be only achieved in the future and through a checkerboarded solution.

Spider-Man PS4

Given the rumors that the next generation of hardware will be the last, Sony may be trying to future proof the PS5 so that it can remain on the market for as long as possible. Given the information provided by Mark Cerny, Sony may be intending to utilize every feature of the PS5 to its entirety before considering what could come after. By future proofing the PlayStation 5, Sony can anticipate where the industry is heading, ultimately eliminating the need for a mid-generation upgrade with a PS5 Pro.

I have been a PlayStation fan for as long as I can remember, but have recently branched out with the Xbox One X and PC gaming to experience what those ecosystems have to offer. By broadening my horizons, I maintain an outside perspective on how Sony is upholding its promise to gamers and how the competition tackles similar issues created by an ever-growing industry. With the eighth generation nearing its completion, I look forward to discussions such as this one as it generates hope and excitement for the future of the brand.

While the PlayStation 4’s colossal success this generation will provide a jump-start in sales for the company’s new hardware, the beginning of a new generation only reinvigorates the console wars. As a firm believer in what both Sony and Microsoft will do to shape the future of the industry, I am reminded that competition breeds excellence. Furthermore, when competition is present between both parties to win over public appeal, in the end, consumers emerge victorious.

Continue Reading